by TPO O\'Halloran on May 3, 2014

Gale Minchew

What difference, at this point, does it make

by TPO O\'Halloran on April 4, 2014

In January, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton got into a heated exchange with Republican Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin during her testimony on Benghazi before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Johnson asked Clinton to ascertain whether the September 11, 2012, terrorist attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya was a response to an anti-Islam YouTube video. A visibly-furious Clinton took exception to Johnson’s inquiry and shot back, “Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided they’d go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?”

The Clinton Chronicles – Please Take the Time to Watch THIS!!

The Imaginary Non-Interventionist

by Veronica Coffin on August 31, 2014



By Daniel Greenfield

Ever since Hillary broke with Barack over the virtues of doing stupid stuff, the editorial columnists have been pretending that she has some new and exciting foreign policy.

She doesn’t.

The left has been denouncing her as an interventionist, the second coming of George W. Bush. They just can’t explain how Hillary is any more of an interventionist than her old boss who bombed Libya, is bombing Iraq and wanted to bomb Syria. Other places he’s bombing include Yemen and Pakistan. And all that is without taking account of his attempt to implement the Arab Spring’s regime changes across the region with tragic and disastrous results.

The closest thing to a disagreement between them was over Syria and considering that Obama was days away from getting into Syria, that’s not much of a firewall.

Hillary took a cheap shot at Obama. The media spent so much time discussing the cheap shot and their hugging summit that it completely ignored the fact that it was a cheap shot with no substance to it. Hillary and Obama have the same ideological DNA and get their ideas from the same narrow circles. Hillary doesn’t have a better or worse foreign policy. They both have the same foreign policy.

Underneath the manufactured political reality show drama that happens when a candidate of the same party as a lame duck administration tries to explain why she’s so different than the miserable failure now holding down the job is the sober reality that they’re both reading from the same scripts.

How could they not?

Hillary Clinton is trying to distance herself from the foreign policy of an administration in which she served as Secretary of State. Hillary is trying to distance herself from her own approach to international relations That’s a level of schizophrenia that is a bit extreme even for a woman who sheds accents, identities and sports team affinities the way that a snake sheds its skin.

Hillary isn’t disavowing Obama. She’s disavowing Hillary.

The newly reinvented Hillary is suddenly pro-Israel after spending years berating the Jewish State. She suddenly realized the importance of having a coherent foreign policy after having the same confused position on Iraq as John Kerry. She is suddenly full of the wisdom that was missing until last year. And she’s somehow more of an interventionist than Obama even though they were both intervening in the exact same places.

Hillary is an interventionist. But so is Obama.

The non-interventionist, like the pacifist, is a mythical woodland creature who appears in the fables of many cultures. He isn’t however to be found in the vicinity of Washington D.C.

Break down the arguments of the non-interventionist and you will find a set of conspiracy theories explaining why every previous intervention was motivated by bad faith, secret agendas and racism. The non-interventionist doesn’t reject intervention; instead he contends that every previous intervention failed because it was carried out at the behest of the banks, the military-industrial complex, the CIA, the Jews, American arrogance and the oil industry.

But the non-interventionist who makes it into the White House is free to intervene as much as he likes because his motives are pure. He isn’t trying to secretly build oil pipelines or put money into Haliburton. He won’t be a unilateral cowboy launching new crusades for no good reason. And so he becomes the non-interventionist interventionist, the multilateral unilateralist, the good invader.

The fake interventionist is a lot more dangerous than the real interventionist because he thinks that he has learned all the lessons from history when all he has done is filled his head with idiotic conspiracy theories. By assigning evil underhanded motives to all his predecessors, he passes up the opportunity to actually learn from their example and instead operates under an unrealistic sense of self-confidence in his own judgement. Because he is certain that they were evil and he isn’t, he believes that he can do no wrong.

A true non-interventionist would reject intervention wholesale. Our fake non-interventionists turn up their noses at it when their political opponents do it. But once they have the power, they intervene out of entirely pure motives such as helping the Muslim Brotherhood take over entire countries.

Obama is a non-interventionist because he spends a lot of time hesitating and apologizing for each intervention. He doesn’t however bother getting permission from Congress or even UN approval.

Why should he? His motives are pure. Process is a way of slowing down men with impure motives such as George W. Bush. But pacifist saints can bomb as many countries as they want without the requirements of process getting in the way.

Hillary’s crime is that she currently sounds somewhat less apologetic and uncertain about intervention, but that’s not policy, that’s pose. Hillary’s husband boasted on the day before September 11 that he passed on killing Bin Laden because of the collateral damage. And Bill Clinton is, if anything, more of a hawk than his wife.

Anyone who thinks that Hillary is a hawk has forgotten how American personnel in Benghazi were left in a precarious security situation on her watch. It’s quite possible that Hillary might decide to bomb Syria. But don’t expect her to bomb in defense of American national interests.

She’s not that kind of interventionist.

Hillary knows that many voters are unhappy about American weakness. They don’t actually want war, but they want someone in the White House whom Putin will take seriously. And they know that isn’t Obama.

Hillary is temporarily talking tough to win them over encouraging them to forget her Reset Button pandering to the Russians and instead convince them that she’s the woman to make Vladimir respect America again. And to do that she has to sound more assertive in foreign affairs than Obama.

That doesn’t mean that Hillary Clinton can stand up to Putin any better than Obama. Or that she will. But she needs uncertain Democrats to believe that the new boss will be different than the old boss, when the new boss is really the old boss in a pantsuit and with worse posters.

Unfortunately Democrats and Republicans don’t currently differ very much on foreign policy. Where they differ is orientation. And that’s more significant than it sounds. Both Obama and McCain would have backed the Arab Spring, but McCain would have done it out of a misguided sense that it was in America’s national interest, while Obama did it to undermine American national interests.

The significance of the difference is not so much in the outcome as in attitude and in the tools that they use.

Obama and McCain would have both bombed Libya, but Obama holds the military in contempt and treats it that way. Obama and McCain would have both endorsed the Arab Spring, but Obama did it in a way that signaled American weakness. That is why Obama’s approach has weakened America even more than the actual outcome of his policies.

A country can survive bad policy. We’ve had bad foreign policy for much of the 20th century. But a leader who communicates that the bad policy is a symptom of national weakness is a disaster on a whole other scale. Both Carter and Reagan made mistakes, but Carter and Reagan sent two very different messages about American power even while they made their mistakes.

Leadership isn’t always about what you do. It’s about how you communicate your priorities and values.

Hillary Clinton is trying to package her old Obama policies with a new attitude, but underneath the attitude is the same old lefty radical who smooched Arafat’s wife, brought a Reset Button to Russia and apologized to Pakistan for a YouTube video.

We’ve already seen Hillary’s foreign policy on display in Pakistan, Russia and Benghazi. All the cheap shots at Obama won’t change the fact that Hillary’s foreign policy is another Obama rerun.





Explosive information previously available is being incorporated into our case that the Obama administration was indeed involved in the production and promotion of the video that has become known as “Innocence of Muslims” blamed for the attacks in Benghazi. This information also breathes new life into the argument that the attacks included a kidnapping operation gone wrong.

Hani Nour Eldin on Al-Jazeera after visit to U.S.

Hani Nour Eldin on Al-Jazeera after visit to U.S.

On the week of June 18, 2012, a confirmed member of Gamaa Islamiya – an officially designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) – Hani Nour Eldin traveled to Washington as part of a delegation and met with senior Obama administration officials. One of those officials was then Deputy National Security Advisor Denis McDonough.


Hillary (L) and Denis McDonough (R)

Hillary (L) and Denis McDonough (R)

As a member of an FTO, Eldin never should have been granted a visa, let alone meetings with senior Obama administration officials. Then House Homeland Security Chairman Rep. Peter King (R-NY) sent a letter to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano demanding an explanation. In an interview cited by the Daily Beast, Eldin said he spoke to McDonough about releasing Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman (the Blind Sheikh):

…Eldin says, he asked Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough about transferring Abdel-Rahman to an Egyptian prison. He said his request was declined. “When I raised this issue in the White House I was told it was not in their authority and all judicial issues relating to sentences must be discussed with the Department of Justice,” he says. Transferring Abdel-Rahman, says Eldin, “would be a gift to the revolution.” McDonough didn’t reply to requests for comment made Thursday afternoon.[1]

Beginning at the 1:09 mark in a video interview with Arabic media a few days after he returned to Egypt from Washington, Eldin said he spoke to the U.S. Justice Department to proclaim the innocence of the Blind Sheikh and asked if he could visit with him. According to Eldin, that request was denied.

In Arabic, Eldin even admitted on video that he was a member of a designated terrorist group saying that he was indeed “a member of Gamaa Islamiya.” (3:47).

So a terrorist – according to the U.S. State Department – is allowed entry into the U.S. as long as his terrorist organization is legitimized by the Egyptian Parliament; that makes it also legitimate in the White House.

When Eldin was asked how he was allowed to enter the U.S. as a member of the terrorist organization, he responded that as a member of the Egyptian Parliament, the process was made easier and that the U.S. wanted to learn about the different factions within the Parliament.

Under the guise of the U.S. government wanting to learn about the different Islamic factions within Parliament, it was clear the agenda from Eldin’s perspective was the Blind Sheikh which Eldin discusses on the tape (1:09):



The Obama administration knew that Eldin was a terrorist member of Gamaa Islamiya; he made that clear in the interview. Yet, according to the Daily Beast article a State Department spokesman said:

“We have no information suggesting that he or anyone else in the delegation is a member of the Egyptian Islamic Group (Gamaa Islamiya).”[2]

While this is false, something else occurred on June 18th that year and it all has to do with a big plan titled The Istanbul Process which was initiated by the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) with the U.S. State Department headed by Hilary Clinton.

The Istanbul Process’s plans, effects and implementation were all set in motion when the YouTube channel of NewsPoliticsNow3 (NPN3) was created. Less than three months later on September 11th, NPN3 would upload a 1:32 excerpt of the video the Obama administration would blame for the Benghazi attacks. As has reported, it was NPN3 (not Sam Bacile aka Nakoula Basseley Nakoula) that would use the name “Innocence of Muslims” to identify the video (h/t Montagraph):

NPN3 YouTube Channel on 9/12/12. First to name video "Innocence of Muslims"

NPN3 YouTube Channel on 9/12/12. First to name video “Innocence of Muslims”

As has reported, NPN3 has been connected – through its avatar – to a company named Stanley Associates, which was purchased by CGI in 2010. CGI is the company that built the Obamacare website.

Just as the week of Eldin’s visit to Washington coincided with the creation of the NPN3 YouTube channel, so too did the date Bacile’s YouTube channel was created coincide with two interesting visits, an Egyptian delegation to the U.S. and a Hillary Clinton visit to Istanbul, Turkey.

On Sunday April 1, 2012, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was in Istanbul and met with Medea Daghestani. As reported, Daghestani is believed to operate from Turkey and has engaged in suspicious activities with Syrian rebel commanders, to include Skype sex.

Medea Daghestani meets with Hillary Clinton in Istanbul on April 1, 2012.

Medea Daghestani meets with Hillary Clinton in Istanbul on April 1, 2012.

The stated purpose for Hillary’s meeting with Daghestani was to discuss the plight of the Syrian people and the progress of the Syrian National Council. As we learned with Eldin’s visit to the White House, the stated purpose of meetings isn’t always the real purpose.

A couple of days later, another Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood delegation visited the White House. It included Muslim Sisterhood daughter Sondos Asem and Abdul Mawgoud Dardery. As reported, the delegation met with two prominent figures in the Obama administration – Samantha Power and Steve Simon.

As the delegation was meeting with these officials, the Sam Bacile YouTube channel was created, on April 4th. Again, note that the name “Innocence of Muslims” was not used by Bacile. It was only used by NPN3 when the 1:32 excerpt was uploaded on September 11, 2012:

Nakoula did not use "Innocence of Muslims" and joined YouTube on April 4, 2012.

Nakoula did not use “Innocence of Muslims” and joined YouTube on April 4, 2012.

It is worth revisiting that Sam Bacile (aka Nakoula) became an informant / FBI operative in 2010 and presumably so remained until he was arrested for violating parole shortly after the Benghazi attacks.

As has maintained, a strong case can be made that the video blamed for the Benghazi attacks fits almost perfectly into the agenda of the “Istanbul Process”, a series of annual meetings designed to figure out ways to eliminate criticism of Islam in western countries. Hillary Clinton co-chaired the first of these meetings, which took place on July 15, 2011. One day earlier, casting for the video officially began.

Statements from U.S. Embassy in Cairo
Further strengthening the case of Obama administration involvement in the video’s production is the matter of Larry Schwartz, the senior public affairs officer at the U.S. embassy in Cairo at the time of the Benghazi attacks. He issued the following statement at 6:18am ET / 12:18pm Cairo time, nearly four hours prior to the protests outside his embassy over the video began, via the New York Times:

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others.

Long after the Cairo protests began and after the Benghazi Compound had been attacked, Hillary Clinton issued a statement that sounded eerily similar to the one issued by Schwartz prior to the protest. Clinton’s statement said in part:

Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.

According to Josh Rogin in an article one day after the attacks, Schwartz’s obviously premature statement led to controversy in the media and greatly angered Hillary.[3]

Robert K. Butler contributed to this report

You are encouraged to review our previous findings in conjunction with our “Ironclad Report” and what is presented below.

[1] Link:

[2] Ibid

[3] Link:



Hillary, Huma and the Muslim Brotherhood

August 16, 2014

    By Paul  Dowling Hillary, Huma, & Global Islamism “Indeed, the worst of living creatures in the sight of Allah are those who have disbelieved, and they will not [ever] believe.” —Surat Al-’Anfāl (The Spoils of War)* The Clintons & the Muslim Brotherhood Bill and Hillary Clinton are friends with Bassam Erstwani, chairman of […]

Read the full article →

Hillary’s BOOK TOUR to Paris and Berlin; Courtesy of U.S. Taxpayers

August 12, 2014

Email this page    Hillary’s Book was a flop in the U.S., so she goes to Paris and Berlin for a book tour that TAXPAYERS paid for! –VC Expensive ‘Choices’: U.S. taxpayers spent $55,000 on travel expenses for Hillary Clinton’s BOOK TOUR in Paris and Berlin – including a her $3,668-a-night hotel suite $3,668 hotel […]

Read the full article →

Hillary Clinton thinks Obama didn’t help Muslim Brotherhood enough in Syria

August 11, 2014

    By Ben Barrack As ISIS drags Iraq and Syria deeper into the pit, Hillary Clinton is attempting to distance herself from the Obama policies that have strengthened ISIS. Her argument is that Obama didn’t do enough to help the larger ISIS umbrella known as the Muslim Brotherhood against Bashar al-Assad. Considering that Clinton’s […]

Read the full article →

The Hypocrisy of Hillary and Chelsea Clinton

August 5, 2014

Email this page    Liberal élites are masters at “Do as I say, not as I do” hypocrisy. On June 12, 2014, at its annual gala, the Wildlife Conservation Society conferred honors on Hillary and Chelsea Clinton for their commitment to save elephants and to protect wildlife and wild places. Bill Clinton and New York […]

Read the full article →

Hillary Clinton Doesn’t Need a Lot of Info to be in Charge

August 3, 2014

Email this page    By Kevin Jackson The Left wants another historical president, and the next village idiot they are touting is Hillary Clinton. The woman who failed the Bar Exam in DC, and can’t name ONE significant accomplishment as Senator or Secretary of State. Recently Clinton put her foot in her mouth, commenting about […]

Read the full article →

Angry protesters at Hillary’s book-signing in hometown

August 2, 2014

Email this page    By Dr. Eowyn On June 29, 2014, the Hildebeast was in her hometown of Chappaqua, New York, for a book signing of her turkey, Hard Choices. Angry protesters lined the street, condemning Hillary for Benghazi, NAFTA and other free trade agreements that benefit the elites but outsource U.S. jobs, and her […]

Read the full article →

Clinton State Department Racket Hauled in $48 Million for Clinton Machine

August 2, 2014

Email this page    So let me get this straight. Bill Clinton delivers 215 speeches around the globe while his wife is Secretary of State, hauling in $48 million for various Clinton family interests, and the Obama administration handed the Clintons an “ethical waiver” 100% of the time? There was not one single speech that […]

Read the full article →

Hillary Clinton reveals what it’s like to be poor in America

August 1, 2014

Email this page    After her tour in the White House ended, she answered the call from her adopted state of New York and voluntarily gave up a lucrative career trading cattle futures to act as one of only two US senators from that state. In 2008, after tirelessly devoting herself to helping Barack Obama […]

Read the full article →

Hillary Clinton: Hamas uses human shields because “Gaza is pretty small”

July 30, 2014

Email this page    By Robert Spencer Clinton shows no recognition whatsoever, any more than does anyone else in Washington, of Hamas statements such as “killing Jews is worship that draws us closer to Allah” and “Whoever kills a Jew goes to heaven.” Neither she nor any other Washington policymaker shows any recognition of Hamas’s […]

Read the full article →

Clinton State Department Colluded With IRS To Discriminate Against Pro-Israel Groups

July 29, 2014

Email this page    An IRS agent allegedly told Z Street his direction was to “give special scrutiny to organizations connected to Israel” In August of 2010, almost three years before Lois Lerner announced at a law conference that the IRS had indeed targeted certain groups, Z Street filed a lawsuit contending the IRS was […]

Read the full article →

Hillary 2016: A Frightening Future

July 25, 2014

Email this page    By Mitch Hall Since the 2012 presidential election, politicians and pundits from both sides of the aisle have discussed Hillary Clinton’s potential 2016 run as if it is already a certainty. Now most millenials–and future 2016 voters–are too young to know much about the political history of the Clintons, especially the […]

Read the full article →

Clinton Inc. – The Ugly Just Does Not Stop

July 24, 2014

Email this page    By Marion Algier – Ask Marion Megyn Kelly Daniel Halper On Clinton Inc. Daniel Halper The Kelly File     Video: Megyn Kelly and Daniel Halper On Clinton Inc.  – The Kelly File (5:43 Mins) Clinton, Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding of a Political Machine Weekly Standard editor Daniel Halper provides a […]

Read the full article →

Hillary: The Real Alinsky Disciple – Improvements Made to the Original Design

July 18, 2014

Email this page    By The Common Constitutionalist There are things throughout history that one can point to and say, “That changed everything.” Things like electricity, indoor plumbing and gunpowder. Some we can point to as simply upgrades or improvements to the original design. Things like fuel injection, the self-contained rifle cartridge or Hot Shots […]

Read the full article →

Hillary’s $2,777 PER MINUTE Speaking Contracts EXPOSED

July 17, 2014

Email this page    Hillary’s $2,777 PER MINUTE speaking contracts demand a ‘presidential’ teleprompter, let her cancel ‘for any reason whatsoever’ and she’s the only one allowed on stage Speaking contracts covered August 2013 speech at SUNY Buffalo and upcoming August 2014 appearance at University of Nevada, Las Vegas The two events together pulled in […]

Read the full article →

Top 5 sins of Hillary Clinton

July 15, 2014

Email this page    Three years before the 2016 election, the Democratic Party is touting former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton as our next president, but she’s displayed a pattern of lies and deceit that makes her far from an ideal candidate. The following are but a few examples, but are my top five […]

Read the full article →

Hillary’s Book Provides MORE EVIDENCE Huma Abedin a Stealth Muslim Brotherhood Agent

July 13, 2014

Email this page    By Shoebat Foundation While broaching the subject in her book about the controversy surrounding her adviser Huma Abedin’s connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, which went mainstream a full year after those connections were discovered by, Hillary Clinton has inadvertently provided more evidence that Abedin is a stealth agent for the […]

Read the full article →

Chelsea Clinton is paid $75,000 a speech – more than Colin Powell – but all cash goes to the Clinton Foundation

July 10, 2014

Email this page    By Francesca Chambers Chelsea Clinton is regularly paid sums as high as $75,000 to speak at events on behalf of the Clinton Foundation, it was revealed today. A spokesperson for Clinton told the New York Times that ‘the majority of Chelsea’s speeches are unpaid.’ But when she is paid, the spokesperson, […]

Read the full article →

Hillary’s First Night as President (Humor)

July 9, 2014

Email this page    Hillary Clinton was sworn in today as  President.  She has disposed of Bill and is spending her first  night alone in the White House. She has waited several years for  this!! FIRST  NIGHT Suddenly! The ghost of George Washington appears to her,  and Hillary says, “How can I best serve my […]

Read the full article →